Nvidia 730m Benchmark
Room Temperature °C = 73 F Ø
57% AdobeRGB (Argyll 3D)
61% AdobeRGB (Argyll 3D)
% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma:
Download ICC File (X-Rite i1 Basic Pro 2)
Room Temperature °C = 73 F Ø
57% AdobeRGB (Argyll 3D)
61% AdobeRGB (Argyll 3D)
% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma:
Download ICC File (X-Rite i1 Basic Pro 2)
The black value is sufficiently low: cd/m² - when the panel is black, our measurement device barely records anything. This results in a good contrast of . This allows pictures to appear more satisfying and eases the legibility of text when there are reflections on the panel.
The sRGB color spectrum is not covered, but for most buyers this is a nonissue. The colorimeter measures significant deviations from the standard color values but the human eye will not notice these. The only detail which is easily apparent, when comparing to other displays, is the slight blue tinge.
In bright sunlight or in bright surroundings the glossy display prevents the user from comfortably working. The brightness of around cd/m² is quite high, but it cannot completely compensate for the strong reflections on the panel. As such, the user will have to adjust their seating position accordingly so as to prevent direct sunlight/lighting from falling onto the screen.
The touchscreen competition cannot offer much more than a slightly higher brightness as they all use glossy displays and have to suffer from reflections.
IPS technology allows the Zenbook to offer amazing viewing angles. In contrast to TN panels, the viewer can see a clear image (no or slight distortions) whether they look from above, below or from the sides. However, the brightness decreases as the viewing angle rises.
The core of our test model is the popular Core iU CPU manufactured by Intel. This CPU integrates a GPU (Intel HD Graphics ) and the chipset on the same die. The model is equipped with 8 GB RAM and the storage device is a conventional hybrid solution: GB HDD with a cache SSD. The cache is supposed to accelerate frequently used applications.
For an extra Euros (~$), the Zenbook can be equipped with the Intel Core iU. A configuration with an Nvidia GeForce GT M has been announced but is currently unavailable in certain countries, which means the user will have to use the Intel graphics.
System information - Asus Zenbook UXLA-CH
The Core iU is an Intel ULV processor (Ultra Low Voltage) and is specifically designed for Ultrabooks. The TDP of 15 W (Thermal Design Power) is very low (2 W lower than the previous generation). Furthermore, the chipset and IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor) are included on the same die, thus saving power and space.
The standard clock speed of the dual-core CPU is GHz, which can be boosted to GHz using Turbo Boost.
The Cinebench R benchmark is passed by the notebook with points which places it just slightly below the Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus (same processor) with points. The Sony Vaio Pro 13 scores a mere points despite having a stronger CPU (Intel Core iU) due to insufficient cooling.
On battery, the notebook offers the same performance and does not have to throttle the CPU to achieve a longer battery life.
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
Cinebench R CPU Multi 64Bit
Points
Cinebench R OpenGL 64Bit
fps
Help
in comparison
In everyday use, the cache SSD is clearly helpful. Tasks such as turning the laptop on/off or opening Internet Explorer are accelerated. The Zenbook requires a mere 15 seconds to turn on.
In PCMark 7, the UXLA scores 3, points. This places it far under the Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus (4, points) which has the same CPU but also uses an SSD. The Sony Vaio Pro 13 also scores higher (4, points) as it is also equipped with an SSD. The Zenbook UXLA scores the highest in our comparison thanks to having the strongest processor and a SSD RAID system: 5, points.
| PCMark 7 Score | points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated | points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated | points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated | points | |
Help | ||
in comparison
Asus uses a hybrid storage device for the UXLA - a combination of a traditional HDD (Hard Disk Drive) and a mini SSD. Unfortunately for our test model, the competition is equipped with an SSD (Solid State Drive). The hybrid storage device is cheaper and offers more storage space. Unfortunately, unless it is opening a frequently used application, it will have the slow access times of a standard HDD.
The storage device of our test model is the Hitachi Travelstar Z5K HTSA7E with a capacity of GB and a slow operating speed of 5, rpm (revolutions per minute). Furthermore, the small build height of 7 mm is a must to fit into this slim case.
The SSD is a SanDisk SSD U with a 24 GB capacity - surprising, as the technical specifications promise a mere 16 GB. This storage space is not simply added to that of our HDD, but is especially reserved for frequently used applications and files, so as to open these faster.
The benchmark results are mostly from the HDD, as the cache SSD cannot be individually tested. The HD Tune benchmark records an average transfer rate of 88 MB/s which places it at the same level as other devices we have tested from the Hitachi series, which do not use an SSD.
The graphics chip of our test model is found integrated onto the die of our CPU: the Intel HD Graphics . This offers sufficient performance for most users and only games and other graphically demanding programs (such as CAD) cannot be run well on this IGP.
In 3DMark 11, the Zenbook scores points, placing it a little higher than the Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus with a score of points. The Sony Vaio Pro 13 scores points due to weak cooling. The UXLA takes the throne with a score of 1, points. This Ultrabook is equipped with a stronger IGP: the Intel Iris Graphics
While on battery, the performance of the IGP is barely lower and in 3DMark06, the test model scores 5, points instead of 6, points.
| 3DMark 03 Standard | points | |
| 3DMark 05 Standard | points | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | points | |
Help | ||
in comparison
This Ultrabook is not aimed at gamers. The hardware is far too weak to run anything but less-demanding games or older games at low resolutions. The native resolution (Full HD) cannot be used, even for those less-demanding games, as it usually exhausts the IGP. For example, F1 can be run at an average of 33 fps and a minimum of 30 fps in Full HD. However, for this to happen, the graphics settings must all be set to minimum.
The cooler fan works very quietly and is barely noticeable. However, the storage device can prove to be disturbing due to its infrequent bursts of noise. These are limited to dB(A), which is relatively quiet, but the erratic behavior of the HDD means that they are noticeable. The competition is better off thanks to their silent SSDs.
The fan can reach a max of 35 dB(A), which is still quite low (stress test).
Noise Level
| Idle | 30 / 30 / dB(A) | |
| HDD | dB(A) | |
| Load | / dB(A) | |
30 dB 40 dB(A) 50 dB(A) | ||
min: | ||
While idle, the temperatures stay at a max 30 °C and are thus relatively cool. After the stress test, the middle region of the keyboard rises to °C. This is warm, but not too hot. The bottom of the notebook stays below 40 °C - exemplary.
| |||||||||||||||
| Maximum: °C = 99 F Average: 31 °C = 88 F |
| |||||||||
| Maximum: °C = F Average: °C = 91 F |
Power Supply (max.) °C = F
Mobil GPU'lar